Twitter’s former trio of high execs sue Elon Musk’s firm for not paying their authorized payments 

Twitter’s trio of former high managers, who got the sack personally by the polarizing tycoon final October, at the moment are taking the centibillionaire’s firm to courtroom to get better greater than $1 million in authorized charges they’re owed in reference to their function as former company officers.

It’s simply the newest instance of Musk unilaterally deciding he doesn’t have to pay collectors at the same time as he continues to squeeze Twitter customers for each final greenback to prop up the ailing firm.

Not solely has he tried to keep away from paying severance, he has additionally not paid his payments for the usage of a company jet and will have illegally fired a janitor service. 

Ex-CEO Parag Agrawal, chief authorized officer Vijay Gadde, and head of finance Ned Segal at the moment are suing Twitter—and in impact Musk as its proprietor—for reimbursement of bills they incurred on account of representing the corporate in two separate courtroom circumstances.

The three are named as defendants in Baker v. Twitter, a lawsuit alleging the corporate hid information safety vulnerabilities from buyers that had been later revealed by whistleblower Peiter “Mudge” Zatko, whereas Gadde is moreover occasion to the case D’Ambly v. Exoo, involving the web harassment of a reporter.

As well as, extra prices ensued from inquiries by the Securities and Change Fee, the Division of Justice, and the Home Committee on Oversight and Reform reaching way back to July 2022.  

The trio had all signed so-called Director & Officer (D&O) indemnification agreements that shield them personally from authorized legal responsibility as long as they act in good religion as executives of the corporate. Underneath Delaware state legislation, they demand Twitter lastly honor its contractual obligations.

They search an expedited ruling requiring Twitter to adjust to its obligations after a number of makes an attempt by legislation agency Sidley Austin to safe the cash from Jan. 13 onward proved fruitless.

Flying a jet with an engine out and controls that don’t operate

Musk has struggled to avoid wasting the corporate from chapter after saddling Twitter with roughly $13 billion in debt he added from his leveraged buyout of the social media platform.

The brand new proprietor notably described operating Twitter in December as akin to flying a “jet that’s heading in the direction of the earth at nice pace, with the engines on hearth, and the controls don’t operate.” 

Sensing he miscalculated together with his ill-timed $44 billion bid made simply earlier than the underside fell out underneath tech shares, Tesla CEO had initially tried to stroll away from his unsolicited April 2022 tender supply final summer season.

The board underneath then-chairman Bret Taylor demanded he maintain up his finish of the cut price and sued earlier than the Delaware courtroom of chancery. 

Its high decide, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick, then held Musk’s toes to the hearth lengthy sufficient that he had little alternative however to pay stockholders in October the $54.20 per share he owed them. 

Musk’s X Corp. has since moved Twitter’s authorized jurisdiction from Delaware to the state of Nevada.  

Musk, who fancies himself considerably of a jokester and briefly renamed his account “Harry Bōlz” over the Easter weekend, had not responded to the lawsuit as of Tuesday morning.

As an alternative, he accused publishing platform Substack of “huge theft of Twitter information” to assist it launch what he described as a Twitter clone. 

Twitter’s authorized counsel, Michael Blanchard of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, couldn’t be reached by Fortune for remark.