We signify half of the worldwide vogue {industry}–they usually need to cease polluting the planet. However no {industry} can police itself

The attire sector is accountable for between 2 and eight% of annual world greenhouse gasoline emissions. As one of the crucial polluting industries on the planet, it should urgently scale back its environmental impacts.

Up to now, efforts to transition to a extra accountable {industry} are sometimes self-policed. Whereas actual commitments to drive affect have been made, this has traditionally been extra a results of deep commitments from some manufacturers, retailers, and producers to create constructive change throughout the {industry}.

Voluntary initiatives have helped make actual strides in the direction of a extra accountable sector. Nevertheless, they alone can’t drive the required scale of change. Our personal initiative, the Sustainable Attire Coalition (SAC) represents round half of the worldwide attire and footwear {industry}. We all know there are manufacturers, retailers, and producers who’re already going past baseline requirements to decrease their environmental and social impacts–however now we have to see everybody working in the direction of the identical formidable objectives.

Regulation is an important lever for creating an attire and footwear {industry} that protects each individuals and the planet. Sadly, it has lagged far behind what’s required for such an enormous world {industry}. However that is altering, and quick.

Inexperienced and social regulation is coming for the attire sector. In 2023, we anticipate momentum to construct globally for the widespread policing of attire’s sustainability claims. On the SAC, we imagine that is lengthy overdue.

The EU Fee lately proposed the hotly anticipated European Substantiating Inexperienced Claims Directive, aimed toward combating deceptive promoting and stamping out greenwashing. It should require all environmental claims to be backed up with credible proof. Laws is within the pipeline elsewhere too. Within the U.S., for instance, a federal act to guard garment employees’ rights–the FABRIC Act (Fashioning Accountability and Constructing Actual Institutional Change Act)–is within the offing. The New York Style Act is one other proposed invoice that might require corporations with revenues of over $100 million doing enterprise within the state to reveal their environmental efficiency and local weather targets.

As a result of nature of among the work we do on the SAC, it could come as a shock that we don’t suppose voluntary motion alone can clear up attire’s sustainability issues. However the state of affairs is just too pressing–and all our futures rely on it. The window wherein we will act on the local weather disaster is quickly closing. Constant, science-backed regulation is required to assist drive the tangible, industry-wide progress we want.

New legal guidelines to guard individuals and the atmosphere won’t render voluntary initiatives like ours out of date, as we imagine our function sits comfortably alongside laws. Via creating instruments and frameworks, and sharing data, expertise, and finest apply, not solely can we assist attire and footwear companies to ship towards authorized necessities, but in addition be an accelerator for constructive change on a worldwide scale with the assistance of sensible regulation. This ought to be the method for all shopper items industries.

Nevertheless, we need to spotlight the necessity for such laws to be harmonized and obligatory. The proposal for the EU Substantiating Inexperienced Claims Directive doesn’t mandate a single, clearly outlined framework based mostly on scientific foundations, such because the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF), which opens the door to a spread of different methodologies and will undermine reasonably than advance progress within the sector. We’re involved that the directive will create confusion for manufacturers and retailers trying to advance their sustainability credentials, in flip resulting in a rise in miscommunication to customers.

As well as, the directive opens to door to completely different interpretations by member states, which dangers resulting in better fragmentation with regards to how we articulate and talk environmental impacts in EU nations. In a local weather emergency, this isn’t create the readability we have to drive mass shopper change. Because the transfer in the direction of correct policing accelerates, we have to guarantee a constant method is taken worldwide.

Within the meantime, organizations should have a transparent and constant technique for calculating a product’s environmental footprint. Up to now, the PEF nonetheless represents essentially the most holistic, scientifically grounded technique for assessing the environmental affect of a product, decreasing inconsistencies in how life cycle assessments (LCAs) will be interpreted. We firmly imagine motion wants to begin at the moment, not additional down the road whereas additional revisions are developed, consulted on, and piloted. We want clear laws that removes confusion and helps constructive enterprise motion.

No {industry} can police itself. It’s time to manage attire and footwear’s environmental and social impacts. Sturdy laws will drive everybody in our sector–in addition to the broader shopper items {industry}–to step up and take accountability. On the SAC, we acknowledge that regulation will convey us nearer to our shared purpose of an {industry} that leaves the world in a greater place. We’re calling on different voluntary organizations to do the identical.

Andrew Martin is the chief vice chairman on the Sustainable Attire Coalition

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary items are solely the views of their authors and don’t essentially mirror the opinions and beliefs of Fortune.